Comparing Hong Kong and Singapore accounting standards

Comparing Hong Kong and Singapore accounting standards

Being dubbed as two of the Asian Four Small Dragons, Hong Kong and Singapore have been in constant competition with each other to be the easiest place to do business. The two rivaling cities have each attracted large amounts of foreign investment over the years with their geographical advantages and open attitude to free trade, as well as strong infrastructure and favorable business policies.

With the rule of law firmly established in both cities, staying in compliance with local regulations is key. Among these is the requirement to file financial statements in accordance with local accounting standards. In an effort to appeal to foreign investors, these standards are largely aligned with internationally accepted standards: the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB).

That said, some differences between accounting practices in Hong Kong and Singapore remain. In this article we will explore which regulations apply in each city and how these compare to the IFRS.

Accounting Standards of Hong Kong 

Hong Kong adopted its latest version of the Financial Reporting Standards (HKFRS) in January 2005. They comprise of the Hong Kong Accounting Standards (HKAS), its Interpretations and the Hong Kong Financial Reporting Standards. These are issued by the Hong Kong Institute of Certified Public Accountants (HKICPA). The HKFRS is comprised of 41 accounting standards, 9 financial reporting standards and several other interpretations. Each standard explains a specific topic such as inventories, intangible assets and financial instruments.

In addition, the HKICPA issued a simplified set of standards for small and medium-sized companies, known as the SME Financial Reporting Standards (SME-FRF) and SME Financial Reporting Framework (SME-FRF).

In Hong Kong, the SME-FRS, a simplified HKFRS with 17 accounting standards, is applicable for eligible small entities:

  • The company has no public accountability;
  • The annual revenue of the company is below 50 million in local currency;
  • The total assets of the company are below 50 million in local currency;
  • The company has a maximum of 50 employees.

Accounting standards of Singapore 

In Singapore, all companies with financial periods starting on or after January 1, 2003 have to comply with the Singapore Financial Reporting Standards (SFRS). The SFRS includes approximately 39 standards covering specific topics such as revenue recognition, property, plant & equipment, and financial instruments.

The Accounting Standards Council (ASC) of Singapore, preceded by the Council on Corporate Disclosure and Governance (CCDG), authorized small entities to use the Singapore Financial Reporting Standards for Small Entities in preparation of their financial reports in December 2010.

In Singapore, a qualified SME needs to meet the following criteria:

  • SME is not publicly accountable;
  • SME does not publish general-purpose financial statements for external users;
  • SME’s total annual revenue exceeds no more than 10 million in local currency;
  • SME’s total gross assets exceed no more than 10 million in local currency;
  • SME’s total number of employees exceeds no more than 50 people.

Hong Kong compared to IFRS

Property, Plant and Equipment (PPE)

HKAS includes two additional transition provisions:

  1. Exempting certain entities that carried their PPE at revalued amounts before September 30, 1995 and have not revalued since that date from making regular revaluation.

  1. Allowing non-profit entities that previously took advantage of the exemption under SSAP (Statement of Standard Accounting Practice) to deem the carrying amount of an item of PPE as the cost of that item before applying HKAS.

Impairment of Assets

HKAS 36 paragraph 13 specifies that an entity shall apply HKAS 36 to the following assets:

  • Goodwill and intangible assets acquired in business combinations for which the agreement date is on or after January 1, 2005.

  • Other assets prospectively from the beginning of the first annual period beginning on or after January 1, 2005.

Intangible Assets

HKAS paragraph 130 specifies that an entity shall apply HKAS 38 to the accounting procedures for the following intangible assets:

  • Intangible assets acquired in business combinations from which the agreement date is on or after January 1, 2005

  • Other intangible assets prospectively from the beginning of the first annual period beginning on or after January 1, 2005

Financial Instruments Recognition and Measurement

 Generally, HKAS 39 does not permit retrospective application, whereas IAS (International Accounting Standards) 39 allows retrospective application.

Investment Property

HKAS 40 paragraphs 80A on fair value model:

Para 80A of HKAS 40 applies to an entity that has previously applied SSAP 13 (2000) for non-leasehold investment properties. The entity must have chosen to use the fair value model to reflect the effect of applying HKAS 40 on its effective date (or earlier) as an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings for the period in which HKAS 40 is first applied. Paragraph 80A also encourages the entity to adjust the comparative information if the entity has previously disclosed publicly fair value of those properties. Paragraph 80A requires the entity to disclose the fact if otherwise.

HKAS 40 paragraphs 83A and 83B on cost model:

Paragraphs 83A and 83B of HKAS 40 allow an entity to take the carrying amount of the investment property under SSAP 13 (2000) as the deemed cost on the date that HKAS 40 is first applied. Any adjustments, including the reclassification of any amount previously held in revaluation reserve, are to be made to the opening balance of retained earnings. Depreciation on deemed cost commences from the opening balance sheet date.

Singapore compared to IFRS

Property Plant & Equipment

SFRS 16 exempts regular revaluation of assets for which any one-off revaluation was performed between December 1, 1996 and December 31, 1996(both dates inclusive) or for assets that were revalued prior to January 1, 1984. Nevertheless, IAS 16 does not give such an exemption.

 Investments in associates and joint ventures

Compared to SFRS 28, IAS 28 has a different method on this topic. Under IAS 28, a company does not have to account for its investments in associates and ventures using the equity method if its ultimate or any intermediate parent should produce consolidated financial statements that comply with IFRS and public use.

 Impairments of assets – Recoverable amount disclosure for Non-financial assets

The amendment to SFRS 36 was issued to reverse unintended disclosure that become effective on January 1, 2013. It addresses the disclosure of information about the recoverable amount of impaired assets if that amount is based on fair value less costs of disposal. Based on the amendments, the recoverable amount is required to be disclosed only when an impairment loss has been recognized or reversed. In certain cases, the amendments also require that the following be disclosed if the recoverable amount is based on fair value less costs of disposal:

  • The level of the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement is categorized;
  • The valuation techniques used for fair value measurement categorized within level 2 and 3 of the fair value hierarchy, and the key valuation assumptions.

 Another point worth mentioning is that given the expected mandatory effective date of January 1, 2017 and 2018 for the revenue recognition and financial instruments projects, respectively, the Accounting Standards Council of Singapore has now decided to introduce a new financial reporting framework that is identical to IFRS for Singapore listed companies for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2018. This framework will also be made available for voluntary application by all non-listed Singapore-incorporated companies at the same time.

 Source: – By Xu